Impression and registration for full-arch implant dentures (research)

Author_Prof. Gregory-George Zafiropoulos, Germany
Usually, a full denture is delivered following tooth extraction or implant insertion of a fully edentulous arch. A denture is usually used until the final restora- tion is performed. A well-designed full denture should fulfill the following criteria: 1) correct vertical height and maxilla-mandibular relationship; 2) accurate occlusion; 3) appropriate choice of teeth with regard to shape, length, width and position; 4) adequate lip support, and 5) proper function and aesthetics to meet the patient’s expectations. The final resto- ration should fulfill or surpass these requirements. Obtaining a correct impression and accurately evaluating the interocclusal relationship (e.g., interoc- clusal distance, occlusal recording and determina- tion of the exact position of the placed implants) are often challenging and time-consuming tasks.
The aim of the current report is to present an impression and registration technique that allows the transfer of the interocclusal relationship, oc- clusal recording and esthetics that were initially applied to produce a full denture as a template for the reconstruction of the final full-arch implant.
Materials and Methods
Following multiple extraction of a non-salvage- able rest dentition and the placement of six dental implants in positions #4, #5, #6, #11, #12, #13, a full denture was fabricated. After the extrac- tion sites had healed and denture sores were eliminated, the function and esthetics of the denture was optimized. If necessary, angulations, shape and color of the denture teeth and the shape of the denture base were corrected (Fig. 1a).

Fig. 1a_Full denture in situ

The resulting denture was used by the patient until the final restoration was delivered. For the final restoration of the maxilla, an implant-retained denture with telescopic crowns as attachments was planned.
After the implant was uncovered, the denture was modified to allow sufficient space for the healing abutments. A duplicate of the denture (DentDu) was made out of clear resin (Paladur, Heraeus, Hanau, Germany, Fig. 1b). 

 Fig. 1b_Duplicate (DentDu) of the interim denture

A trial of the DentDu was performed and minor occlusal dis- crepancies were corrected (Fig. 1c).

Fig. 1c_Trial of the DentDu

Bite records were taken in centric occlusion with modeling resin using the casts of the original denture. Afterwards, the DentDu was placed in an articulator and a control- ling of the occlusion was made (Fig. 2a) with the bite records
Fig. 2a_Placement of the DentDu in the articulator.

A pickup transfer system consisting of a titanium impression post and a plastic impres- sion sleeve was employed (Dentegris, Duisburg, Germany, Fig. 2b).

Fig. 2b_Pick-up impression system. On the left: titanium impression post (placed on the implant). On the right: plastic impression sleeve (will be left in the impression).

The DentDu was carefully mod- ified by creating internal clearance in the area of the implants so that it could be applied as an indi- vidualized custom tray. This permitted it to be fully seated when the impression posts were in place. Impressions were generated by a polyether mate- rial (Impregum, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MI). During this process, the DentDu was kept in centric occlusion using the bite records (Fig. 3a).

Fig. 3a_Taking the impression with the DentDu. The bite records were used to determine the exact position.

The titanium impression posts were connected with the implant analogues and with the plastic impression sleeves (Dentegris), which were em- bedded in the impression material (Fig. 3b

Fig. 3b_Fabrication of the master cast.

A mas- ter cast was then fabricated and articulated with the help of the bite records (Fig. 3c, Figs. 4a & 4b).

Fig. 3c_Placement of the cast into the articulator using the bite registrations.

Fig. 4a_Master cast.

Fig. 4b_The master cast is placed into the articulator.

Customizable abutments (Dentegris) were taken to fabricate the implant abutments. Paral- lelism, angulation, position and shape of the im- plant abutments were determined using a silicon key fabricated from a matrix of C-silicone (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5_The customized implant abutments are fabricated using a matrix of C-silicone.

The dentist and the dental technician relied on two alternatives for customized abutments selection:
1) UCLA customizable Dentegris) for casting with a chromium cobalt (CrCo) alloy (for example, Ankatit, Anka Guss, Waldaschaff, Germany, Fig. 6b).abutments (UCLA, Dente- gris) for casting with a gold alloy (for example, Portadur P4, Au 68.50 %, Wieland, Pforzheim, Germany, Fig. 6a) or 2) platinum-iridium customiz- able abutments (PTIR, 

clip_image024 clip_image026
Fig. 6a_Gold customized abutments. Fig. 6b_Chromium cobalt (CrCo) customized abutments.

After casting, the customized implant abut- ments were grinded, polished and served as the basis for the fabrication of electroformed pure- gold copings with a thickness of 0.25 mm (AGC Galvanogold, Au > 99.9 %, Wieland, Fig. 6c).

Fig. 6c_Electroformed gold copings.
The abutments were transferred, positioned on the implants and torqued to 35 Nm using a resin transfer key (pattern resin, GC; Figs. 7a & b).

clip_image030 clip_image032
Figs. 7a & b_The customized abutments are mounted on the implants using a transfer key.
From this point on, the customized abutments remained fixed in order to avoid any possible inaccuracies. The electroformed copings were placed on the im- plant abutments (Fig. 7c).

Fig. 7c_Electroformed gold copings in situ.

The mock-up was placed over the electroformed copings and the occlusion was checked with the bite records (Figs. 8a & b).
clip_image036 clip_image038
Figs. 8a & b_Brial of the mock-up.

A final impression with a polyether impression material (Impregum, 3M ESPE) was taken with electroformed copings. The mock-up was further set up and used for the fabrication of a new
framework was then constructed via CAD/CAM. To ensure proper functioning of the framework, a plastic mock-up and a temporary fixed denture (TFD) were milled (ZENO-PMMA, Wieland). The customized implant abutments, the electroformed copings, the mock-up and the TFD were deliv- ered by the dental laboratory for the next clinical session. master cast. After the impression was taken, the TFD was fixed on the implant abutments using temporary cement (TempBond, Kerr, Orange, CA). It was then left in place until the delivery of the final restoration (Fig. 8c).
Fig. 8c_Temporary fixed denture in situ.

The new master cast was articulated with the help of the gold copings and the mock-up. The metal framework was milled (here: Titanium Zenotec TI, Wieland, Fig. 9a).
Figs. 9a–d_Final telescopic crown retained implant denture, palatal; (a), anterior teeth (b), right side (c), left side (d).
The veneering of the superstructure was made using a light-cured indi- rect ceramic polymer (Ceramage, SHOFU, Menlo Park, CA, Figs. 9a–d). The electroformed gold cop- ings were fixed in the metal framework using a self-curing compomer cement (AGC Cem, Wieland, Fig. 10).
Fig. 10_Placement of the electroformed copings into the frame.
The above-described procedures can be also performed in cases in which a fixed denture was planned for the rehabilitation of the full-arch (Figs. 11a & b, Figs. 12a–c) and in cases where part of the natural dentition is periodontally stable and can be applied as abutments.
Figs. 11a & b_A case of fixed implant retained denture for the maxilla full-arch rehabilitation: trial of the mock-up (a) and the milled temporary fixed denture is placed on the abutments (b).
Figs 12a–c_A case of fixed-implant retained denture for the maxilla full-arch rehabilitation, right site (a), anterior area (b), left site (c).
In these cases, the immediate full denture can be designed as a cover denture. From this cover denture, a DentDu could be fabricated and further used as described above (Figs. 13a–c).
Figs. 13a–c_Impression of a case with natural dentition (teeth #11 and #12) and implants. Master cast in the articulator with a duplicate of the over-denture in place (b). Gold copings fixed on the remaining teeth #11 and #12 and customized implant abutments mounted on the implants (both of them served as primary telescopes (c).
Porcelain is a possible material for veneering of fixed-denture frameworks. If the angulation of the implants does not allow for taking impressions in the above-described way and an open-tray im- pression is preferable, fenestrations can be fabri- cated into the DentDu (Fig. 14).
Fig. 14_DentDu modified for open-tray impression technique.

The reconstruction of the fully edentulous arch with implant-retained dentures necessitates thor- ough planning and a precise and passive fit of the suprastructure. A previous study demonstrated that a passive fit between the implant superstruc- ture and the underlying abutments is essential for the long-term success of the implant prosthesis.5
To achieve a passive fit, an accurate positioning of the implant replicas in the master cast must be as- sured. The impression technique and the splinting of the implant copings are factors which may contribute to errors in the final positioning of the implant analogs, thus leading to inaccuracies in the fit of the final superstructure.5-10 Furthermore, the angulation or proximity of the implants may inhibit proper seating of the impression copings and/or caps, which may also have a detrimental ef- fect on the registration of the implant position.
The precise recording of the maxillo-mandibu- lar, e.g. interocclusal, relationship is a prerequisite for achieving proper occlusion and a successful treatment outcome.1,10 The initially delivered den- ture allowed for the correction of the interocclusal relationship, tooth shape and color and angula- tions during the entire healing period. In this way, the patient was able to acclimatize to the function and esthetics of the denture. In the method de- scribed in this report, an accurate impression and recording of the full denture was achieved by using a duplicate as a custom tray for the impression. Therefore, it was not necessary to repeat all the steps usually needed for recording the interoc- clusal relationship, e.g. wax-up, etc., at the time of the fabrication of the final restoration.
If an open-tray impression is preferred, only mi- nor changes to the procedure are necessary. This method is based on a previous publication.12 In cases such as this, it is advisable to fabricate two DentDus. The impression can be taken by the first DentDu; the second DentDu is used for the remaining steps. Customized abutments are applied instead of a bar, galvano copings allow a precise transfer coping, and secondary telescopes as well as different technolo- gies are employed for the transfer of implant posi- tions and for the construction of the superstructure.
Customized implant abutments allows for bet- ter angulations and shape, for improved occlusal force transmission from the crown to the implant and the bone, and also for facilitating the fabrica- tion of an esthetically pleasing implant-supported denture. Ways in which abutment design con- tributes to improved esthetics include changes in the location of the crown and changes in the di- mension and/or form of the restorative platform.
Additionally, features of the abutment design contribute to the health and dimensional stability of the soft tissue. Current attempts to objectively define implant-restoration esthetics have focused on periimplant mucosal parameters.13,14 The intro- duction of the UCLA abutment provided a custom solution for implant restorations. This direct-to- implant restoration concept provided adaptability. Through waxing and casting, the height, diameter and angulations can be addressed in order to pro- vide a wide range of clinical solutions for problems associated with limited interocclusal distance, interproximal distance, implant angulations and related soft tissue responses.
The customized implant abutments served as primary telescopes, and the electroformed copings served as secondary telescopes in cases where a re- movable denture with telescopic crowns was used as the attachment. Electroformed gold copings are associated with several advantages, in conjunc- tion with both removable and fixed restorations. The galvano-forming and electroforming process yielded a precisely-fitted secondary coping for the implant abutment with a gap of only 12–30 µm. The gold electroformed coping saves space and is made of high-quality material.2-4 Using gold copings for the impression allows for the exact transfer of the form, angulations and position of the inserted customized implant abutments.
With the help of the milled mock-up, the future fit of the CAD/CAM fabricated framework can be evaluated and necessary changes in the shape of the restoration and occlusion can be made. Making these changes on the mock-up was easier and less time consuming than making them on the metal framework itself, and it was then possible to trans- fer them directly to the final framework. Further- more, the mock-up almost “splinted” the electro- formed gold copings during the impression, allow- ing for the exact transfer of the abutment position. At the same time, the vertical height and interocclusal relationship were recorded. The delivery of a milled temporary restoration permitted a slow and non-progressive loading of the implants, which then leads to bone remodeling.16 Abutments were left in place after mounting. Combined with the fabrication of a new cast, this further decreased the risk of inaccuracies during the transfer process
The method described here can be used for full- arch restorations with both fixed and removable implant supported dentures. Accurate impres- sions can be accomplished and occlusion, vertical dimensions, as well as implant positions can be transferred while facilitating the full-arch restora- tion process. In addition, this technique resulted in a reduction of the required chair time
Disadvantages of this technique lie in the fact that the quality of laboratory technician’s work meets higher demands than usual, and that the cli- nician also needs to acquire some additional skills. Further disadvantages of this method include the need for a highly qualified technical lab and higher technical costs relative to those associated with prefabricated titan implant abutments.
To date, this method has not been applied in conjunction with immediate implant loading. However, dentists and patients have come to ex- pect this level of rehabilitative accuracy, precision, long-term success and aesthetics

No comments:


Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Recent Posts


Find us on Facebook



Throughout this text, I note that anyone accessing this site is aware that books, papers, files, power points, documents or programs owned and are trademarks of their respective owners. This virtual site has been designed with educational goals, and scientific opinion. The purpose of this is to deliver tools and support to students who unfortunately do not have money to buy these books and are used in their respective subjects. The author of this website assumes no responsibility for the misuse of this information. None of the books on this blog have been scanned by the same author, these were uploaded to the network by others. All material in this site has been downloaded from and through various websites, forums, programs, partnerships, etc.. And collected throughout the years. We recommend buying the original book.